A better AI workflow starts with a human checkpoint.
A practical guide to automating the repetitive work while keeping the decisions that matter in your hands.
Start with one clear handoff
A useful automation has a clear input, a bounded task and a visible result. Consider a content workflow: a person supplies a brief, AI proposes a draft, and a person checks it before publishing. That review step is part of the workflow, rather than an interruption.
Choose what needs a person
Place a review before an action that makes a public claim, shares personal information or commits to a decision. Give the reviewer the original brief, the draft and its sources together. A yes-or-no approval is easier when the relevant context is in one place.
Make the review concrete
Check names, numbers, source links and dates. Confirm that the draft answers the intended question. Ask whether a reader can distinguish a verified fact from a suggestion. If the answer is unclear, send the work back with a specific correction.
Measure the whole workflow
Record how long drafting and review take together. Track corrections and repeated mistakes. A faster draft is only useful if the full process becomes easier. Start with a small batch, compare it with your usual process and adjust one step at a time.
Further reading
For a structured approach to AI risks and review, see the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. For creating useful web content, see Google’s people-first content guidance.
Put the idea into practice.
Explore AutoFeed, or take a look inside a sample workspace.